BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AS A DRIVER OF GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENES

Lakshmi Triveni Kavuru

doi:10.67809/ijetrm.qup3y0bn

Abstract

Government effectiveness depends on more than the adoption of policies. Agencies must translate policy intent into operational requirements, coordinated decisions, prepared workforces, dependable systems, and accessible services. This conceptual article ex amines project management as an integrative capability that links these activities. It develops the Policy - to - Performance Integration Framework (PPIF), connecting policy alignment, implementation readiness, operational integration, performance assurance, a nd continuous improvement, and advances administrative transition gaps as an analytical lens for understanding breakdowns at organizational handoffs. The discussion distinguishes project delivery from organizational adoption and public - service outcomes, th en proposes governance arrangements, readiness checkpoints, qualitative assessment practices, and feedback mechanisms for implementation. It also considers limitations, trade - offs, and conditions under which project management may add administrative burden rather than value. The framework is presented as a testable conceptual proposition, not an empirically validated model. The article argues that project management can strengthen government effectiveness when it is integrated with institutional decision - ma king and assessed against reliable, accessible, and accountable service delivery.

Keywords

Government effectiveness; policy implementation; project management; administrative coordination; service delivery; operational readiness; public value

References

1) Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond
traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4),
445–456.
2) Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector.
Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176.
3) Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management: The politics of public sector coordination.
University Press of Kansas.
4) Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are
dashed in Oakland; or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all. University of California
Press.
5) Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for
project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382–1394.