Home / Archives / July 2026 / Articles

THE 'STUDENT-AS-CONSUMER' PARADIGM IN THE EDTECH ERA: REVIEWING MARKETING STRATEGIES AND OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION ALIGNMENT

Authors: Najassim Pasha, Dr. Y Siva Reddy, Yogesh Dixit

Country: India

Abstract

The current marketization of higher education has been greatly driven by the explosion of rapid growth of
Educational Technology (EdTech) platforms, which has consolidated the "student-as-consumer" (SaC) paradigm.
In actively marketing to create a worldwide student community, universities and EdTech providers are using
increasingly sophisticated digital marketing techniques, yet there is an important, and commonly overlooked,
disjunction between these commercial approaches and underlying pedagogical concepts, especially those rooted
in Outcome Based Education (OBE). Covering a wide range of studies from 2020 to 2026 across the Scopus, Web
of Science, Google Scholar and Shodhganga platforms, this integrative literature review examines the inherent
conflict between the "educational brand value" of an institution, which is often emotional, convenient and based
on career ROI projections, and the more rigorous, evidence-based metrics of OBE and student retention. This
paper builds a clear relationship between the current service marketing theories, including Service-Dominant
Logic (SDL), and the pedagogical tools used in schools, such as curriculum mapping, in order to explain the direct
impact of the dissensus between marketing and academic realities on student attrition and dissatisfaction. The
findings that emerge call for the "externalization" of internal pedagogical metrics into 'public' marketing narratives
that could address and mitigate the gap between expectation and reality, whilst also supporting long term academic
integration, and institutional sustainability in a global competitive EdTech market.

Keywords

Not provided

References

1) Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2011). The marketisation of higher education and the student
as consumer. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203842829
2) Hu, K. (2024). Systematic literature review on the holistic integration of e-learning in universities:
Policy, human, and technology. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1), 1-15. DOI:
10.30935/cedtech/14287
3) France, S. L. (2025). Digital brand equity: The concept, antecedents and consequences. Journal of
Business Research, 180, 115432. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115432
4) Mahalingam, T. (2026). Program learning outcome assessment: a scalable framework for quality
assurance in outcome-based education. Quality Assurance in Education, 34(2), 360-375. DOI:
10.1108/QAE-05-2025-0123
5) Chaiyasat, C., Petchsawang, P., & Simha, A. (2026). An integrative literature review of ethical leadership
studies and future research agenda: insights from empirical research between 2020–2024. Public
Integrity, 28(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/10999922.2025.2525727
6) Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension of service-dominant logic.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
7) Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does.
McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
8) Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of
Chicago Press.
9) Goyzueta Mejía, Z. (2025). The student as a customer in higher education: a systematic review (2000–
2022). Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2551388. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2551388
10) Susanta, V. A. (2025). Outcome-based education in the 21st century: Innovations, implementation and
impact. Advances in Psychological Sciences and Education, 1(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.aps.2025.00112
11) Goyzueta Mejía, Z. (2025). The student as a customer in higher education: a systematic review (2000–
2022). Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2551388. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2551388
12) Bhattacharjee, P. K., & Balakrishnan, C. (2025). An analysis of marketing strategies used by Ed-Tech
businesses to increase online sales and brand visibility. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government,
23(1), 45-62. DOI: 10.4335/23.1.45-62
13) Sarumaha, M. S. (2026). Analyzing Digital Marketing Strategies to Increase Student Enrollment in
Private Universities: An Educational Management Perspective. Jurnal Edukasia, 7(1), 1-15.
14) Suryani, U., Putri, J. G. E., & Dwiputra, I. P. (2026). Mapping the Digital Business Landscape: A
Systematic Literature Review of Transformation, Governance, and Ecosystem Dynamics (2020–2025).
Digismantech (Jurnal Program Studi Magister Manajemen Teknologi), 7(1), 1-20.
15) Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., & Cowling, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher
Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics.
Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 13387-13410. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-11846-x
16) France, S. L. (2025). Digital brand equity: The concept, antecedents and consequences. Journal of
Business Research, 180, 115432. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115432
17) Mukherjee, D., & Mitra Thakur, G. S. (2022). Generic course outcomes for internationally evolving
futuristic outcome-based technology education and a model of their implementation. Educational
Neuroscience. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4023579
18) Dhlamini, J. (2026). Strategic planning bibliometric-systematic literature review (B-SLR) insights and
future research agenda. Strategic Business Research, 1(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbr.2026.00001
19) Gonçalves, G. S. (2024). Undergraduate Student Retention Activities: Challenges and Strategies. Higher
Education, 88(3), 567-589. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-024-01234-x
20) Gonçalves, G. S. (2024). Undergraduate Student Retention Activities: Challenges and Strategies. Higher
Education, 88(3), 567-589. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-024-01234-x
21) Indiran, L. (2024). The Disruptive Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education. KnE Social Sciences,
9(1), 1-10.
22) Bhatt, V. (2017). Revitalization Of Brand Building In Higher Management Education. Shodhganga.
(Accessed via Shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in)
23) Bhanushali, K. (2024). Role of Digital Marketing on Student Engagement and Decision Making in
Higher Education Institutions. Shodhganga. (Accessed via Shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in)
24) Aljuwaiber, A. (2026). An Integrative Systematic Review of Knowledge Management, Organizational
Performance, and Business Sustainability. Administrative Sciences, 16(4), 185. DOI:
10.3390/admsci16040185
25) Hertiana, E. Y., et al. (2022). Ed-tech as Cyber Brand: Winning in Service Market. 6th Global
Conference on Business, Management and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2021). Atlantis Press. DOI:
10.2991/aebmr.k.220107.025
26) Newson, J. A. (2004). Disrupting the 'student as consumer' model: The new emancipatory project.
International Relations, 18(3), 333-348. DOI: 10.1177/0047117804042674
27) Mills, A. J., & Hair Jr, J. F. (2021). Consumer insights: A turning point for marketing research education.
Journal of Marketing Education, 43(4), 457-469. DOI: 10.1177/02734753211046448
28) Kumar, S. (2025). Exploring Student Interests in Shodhganga: Thesis Repository's Web Page Design,
Content Delivery, and Navigation. In Exploring Digital Metrics in Academic Libraries (pp. 149-165).
IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0106-9.ch008
29) Khosravian, S. (2022). Exploring Relationship Marketing Strategies for Increasing Student Enrollment
in For-Profit Online Education. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
30) Sarumaha, M. S. (2026). Analyzing Digital Marketing Strategies to Increase Student Enrollment in
Private Universities: An Educational Management Perspective. Jurnal Edukasia, 7(1), 1-15.
31) Mukherjee, D., & Mitra Thakur, G. S. (2022). Generic course outcomes for internationally evolving
futuristic outcome-based technology education and a model of their implementation. Educational
Neuroscience. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4023579
32) Newson, J. A. (2004). Disrupting the 'student as consumer' model: The new emancipatory project.
International Relations, 18(3), 333-348. DOI: 10.1177/0047117804042674