COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION TECHNOLOGY AS THE CAUSE OF BRAIN PLASTICITY: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW

Osuolale Sunday

doi:10.5281/zenodo.21399838

Abstract

Hearing loss is a major global health concern that significantly impairs speech perception, communication,
cognitive function, and overall quality of life. Cochlear implantation has revolutionized the management of
severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss by restoring access to auditory information and promoting
functional recovery of the auditory system. Increasing evidence indicates that the clinical benefits of cochlear
implantation extend beyond peripheral hearing restoration by inducing structural and functional brain plasticity
that supports auditory rehabilitation. This comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence on the role of
cochlear implantation in brain plasticity, with particular emphasis on cortical reorganization, cross-modal
plasticity, and the neurobiological mechanisms underlying speech perception recovery. Relevant peer-reviewed
studies employing advanced neuroimaging techniques, including positron emission tomography (PET),
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and
electroencephalography (EEG), were critically examined to evaluate patterns of neural adaptation following
cochlear implantation. The reviewed literature demonstrates that cochlear implantation promotes adaptive
cortical reorganization, enhances multisensory processing, and facilitates improvements in speech recognition
and communication outcomes. However, the extent of neural recovery varies according to factors such as age at
implantation, duration of deafness, rehabilitation intensity, and individual differences in cortical plasticity.
Although audiovisual integration contributes to successful auditory rehabilitation, current evidence suggests that
adaptive brain plasticity is the primary mechanism supporting long-term functional recovery. Future research
should prioritize longitudinal neuroimaging studies and personalized rehabilitation strategies to optimize cortical
adaptation and improve speech perception outcomes. Overall, understanding the role of cochlear implantation in
promoting brain plasticity provides valuable insights for advancing evidence-based clinical practice and
improving the quality of life of individuals with hearing loss.

Keywords

Cochlear implantation; Brain plasticity; Cortical reorganization; Cross-modal plasticity; Auditory rehabilitation; Speech perception; Neuroimaging

References

1) Anderson, C. A., Wiggins, I. M., Kitterick, P. T., & Hartley, D. E. H. (2017). Adaptive benefit of crossmodal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 114(38), 10256–10261.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704785114
2) Calmels, M.-N., Gallois, Y., Marx, M., Deguine, O., Taoui, S., Arnaud, E., Strelnikov, K., & Barone,
P. (2022). Functional reorganization of the central auditory system in children with single-sided
deafness: A protocol using fNIRS. Brain Sciences, 12(4), 423.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040423
3) Alemi, R., Wolfe, J., Neumann, S., Manning, J., Towler, W., Koirala, N., Gracco, V. L., & Deroche,
M. (2023). Audiovisual integration in children with cochlear implants revealed through EEG and
fNIRS. Brain Research Bulletin, 205, 110817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.110817
4) Strelnikov, K., Massida, Z., Rouger, J., Belin, P., & Barone, P. (2011). Effects of vocoding and
intelligibility on the cerebral response to speech. BMC Neuroscience, 12, 122.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-12-122
5) Blamey, P. J., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., ... Lazard, D. S. (2013).
Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: An
update with 2251 patients. Audiology and Neurotology, 18(1), 36–47.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000343189
6) Salles, J., Strelnikov, K., Carine, M., Denise, T., Laurier, V., Molinas, C., & Tauber, M. (2016).
Deficits in voice and multisensory processing in patients with Prader–Willi syndrome.
Neuropsychologia, 85, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.015
7) Buckley, K. A., & Tobey, E. A. (2011). Cross-modal plasticity and speech perception in pre- and
postlingually deaf cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 32(1), 2–15.
https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e8534c
8) Calmels, M.-N., Gallois, Y., Marx, M., Deguine, O., Taoui, S., Arnaud, E., Strelnikov, K., & Barone,
P. (2022). Functional reorganization of the central auditory system in children with single-sided
deafness: A protocol using fNIRS. Brain Sciences, 12(4), 423.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040423
9) Strelnikov, K., Foxton, J., Marx, M., & Barone, P. (2015). Brain prediction of auditory emphasis by
facial expressions during audiovisual continuous speech. Brain Topography, 28(3–4), 494–505.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0338-2
10) Kral, A. (2007). Unimodal and cross-modal plasticity in the deaf auditory cortex. International Journal
of Audiology, 46(9), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020701383027
11) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Démonet, J.-F., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2010).
Does brain activity at rest reflect adaptive strategies? Evidence from speech processing after cochlear
implantation. Cerebral Cortex, 20(5), 1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp183
12) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2009). Improvement in
speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf
and cochlear implanted subjects. Neuropsychologia, 47(4), 972–979.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.017
13) Lee, D. S., Lee, J. S., Oh, S. H., Kim, S.-K., Kim, J.-W., Chung, J.-K., ... Kim, C. S. (2001). Crossmodal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature, 409(6817), 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/35051653
14) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2009). Role of
speechreading in audiovisual interactions during the recovery of speech comprehension in deaf adults
with cochlear implants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 437–444.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00741.x
15) Lyness, C. R., Woll, B., Campbell, R., & Cardin, V. (2013). How does visual language affect crossmodal plasticity and cochlear implant success? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2621–
2630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.011
16) Strelnikov, K., Rosito, M., & Barone, P. (2011). Effect of audiovisual training on monaural spatial
hearing in horizontal plane. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e18344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018344
17) Pavani, F., & Röder, B. (2022). Neuroplasticity following cochlear implants. In The Oxford Handbook
of Auditory Science. Oxford University Press.
18) Paul, B. T., Bajin, M. D., Uzelac, M., et al. (2022). Evidence of visual cross-modal reorganization
positively relates to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users. Scientific Reports, 12, 18514.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22117-z
19) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Démonet, J.-F., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2015).
Increased audiovisual integration in cochlear-implanted deaf patients: Independent components
analysis of longitudinal positron emission tomography data. European Journal of Neuroscience, 41(5),
677–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12827
20) Sandmann, P., Dillier, N., Eichele, T., et al. (2012). Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects
maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users. Brain, 135(2), 555–568.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr329
21) Strelnikov, K., Marx, M., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2015). PET-imaging of
brain plasticity after cochlear implantation. Hearing Research, 322, 180–187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.006
22) Salles, J., Strelnikov, K., Carine, M., Denise, T., Laurier, V., Molinas, C., & Tauber, M. (2016).
Deficits in voice and multisensory processing in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome.
Neuropsychologia, 85, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.015
23) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Démonet, J.-F., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2010).
Does brain activity at rest reflect adaptive strategies? Evidence from speech processing after cochlear
implantation. Cerebral Cortex, 20(5), 1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp183
24) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2009). Improvement in
speech-reading ability by auditory training. Neuropsychologia, 47(4), 972–979.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.017
25) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2009). Role of
speechreading in audiovisual interactions during recovery of speech comprehension. Scandinavian
Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00741.x
26) Strelnikov, K., Rosito, M., & Barone, P. (2011). Effect of audiovisual training on monaural spatial
hearing in horizontal plane. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e18344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018344
27) Strelnikov, K., Massida, Z., Rouger, J., Belin, P., & Barone, P. (2011). Effects of vocoding and
intelligibility on the cerebral response to speech. BMC Neuroscience, 12, 122.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-12-122
28) Strelnikov, K., Foxton, J., Marx, M., & Barone, P. (2015). Brain prediction of auditory emphasis by
facial expressions during audiovisual continuous speech. Brain Topography, 28(3–4), 494–505.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0338-2
29) Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Démonet, J.-F., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2015).
Increased audiovisual integration in cochlear-implanted deaf patients. European Journal of
Neuroscience, 41(5), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12827
30) Strelnikov, K., Marx, M., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2015). PET-imaging of
brain plasticity after cochlear implantation. Hearing Research, 322, 180–187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.006
31) Xiu, B. X., Paul, B. T., Chen, J. M., Le, T. N., Lin, V. Y., & Dimitrijevic, A. (2022). Neural responses
to naturalistic audiovisual speech are related to listening demand in cochlear implant users. Frontiers in
Human Neuroscience, 16, 1043499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.1043499
32) Bálint, A., Caversaccio, M., & Weder, S. (2022). Neural activity during audiovisual speech processing:
Development of an fNIRS paradigm. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(6), e38407.
https://doi.org/10.2196/38407
33) Anderson, C. A., Lazard, D. S., & Hartley, D. E. H. (2017). Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal
cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.
Hearing Research, 343, 138–149.
34) Campbell, R. (2008). The processing of audio-visual speech: Empirical and neural bases. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1493), 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2155
35) Capretta, N. R., & Moberly, A. C. (2016). Does quality of life depend on speech recognition
performance? Laryngoscope, 126(3), 699–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25563
36) Dillon, M. T., Buss, E., Rooth, M. A., et al. (2018). Effect of cochlear implantation on quality of life in
adults with hearing loss. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 144(5), 440–448.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0248
37) McRackan, T. R., Bauschard, M., Hatch, J. L., et al. (2018). Meta-analysis of quality-of-life
improvement after cochlear implantation. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 144(5), 442–
450.
38) Holden, L. K., Finley, C. C., Firszt, J. B., et al. (2013). Factors affecting open-set word recognition in
adults with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 34(3), 342–360.
39) Lazard, D. S., Vincent, C., Venail, F., et al. (2012). Pre-, per-, and postoperative factors affecting
performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiology and Neurotology,
17(1), 28–38.
40) Zhou, X., Zhang, Q., Xi, X., et al. (2023). Cortical responses correlate with speech performance in
prelingually deaf cochlear implant children. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1126813